3. Principle 3 — Accountability
Issue: How can we assure that designers, manufacturers, owners, and operators of A IS are responsible and accountable?
To best address issues of responsibility and accountability:
1. Legislatures courts should clarify issues of responsibility, culpability, liability, and accountability for A IS where possible during development and deployment (so that manufacturers and users understand their rights and obligations).
2. Designers and developers of A IS should remain aware of, and take into account when relevant, the diversity of existing cultural norms among the groups of users of these A IS.
3. Multi stakeholder ecosystems should be developed to help create norms (which can mature to best practices and laws) where they do not exist because A IS oriented technology and their impacts are too new (including representatives of civil society, law enforcement, insurers, manufacturers, engineers, lawyers, etc.).
4. Systems for registration and record keeping should be created so that it is always possible to find out who is legally responsible for a particular A IS. Manufacturers operators owners of A IS should register key, high level parameters, including:
• Intended use
• Training data training environment (if applicable)
• Sensors real world data sources
• Process graphs
• Model features (at various levels)
• User interfaces
• Actuators outputs
• Optimization goal loss function reward function
Published by The IEEE Global Initiative on Ethics of Autonomous and Intelligent Systems in Ethically Aligned Design (v2): General Principles, (v1) Dec 13, 2016. (v2) Dec 12, 2017