The rise of AI decision making also implicates fundamental rights of fairness, accountability, and transparency.

We state clearly that the primary responsibility for AI systems must reside with those institutions that fund, develop, and deploy these systems.

The aim of this principle is to enable independent accountability for automated decisions, with a primary emphasis on the right of the individual to know the basis of an adverse determination.

The Right to a Human Determination reaffirms that individuals and not machines are responsible for automated decision making.

But the aim remains to ensure accountability.

The institution responsible for an AI system must be made known to the public.

The Identification Obligation establishes the foundation of AI accountability which is to make clear the identity of an AI system and the institution responsible.

The Identification Obligation establishes the foundation of AI accountability which is to make clear the identity of an AI system and the institution responsible.

Assessment and accountability Obligation.

Institutions must be responsible for decisions made by an AI system.

The Assessment and accountability Obligation speaks to the obligation to assess an AI system prior to and during deployment.

The aim is to avoid the information asymmetry that arises increasingly with AI systems and to ensure the possibility of independent accountability.

The Termination Obligation is the ultimate statement of accountability for an AI system.